Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]
92
Feature Request / Re: Inclination
« Last post by jcarrion on January 23, 2018, 02:25:26 AM »
hello jcarrion,

Just to be clear: equatorial/equatorial inclination is one thing, bearing is another one (90 bearing starting at KSC will result in a 25 orbital inclination). I was speaking about inclination (as probably you too in the parameter dialog), not bearing. To my opinion, switching inclination sign in the dialog (and allowing -180 to +180) would be enough for a start...
yep , of course. What I was referring is that -currently -  instead of "inclination" , it should say "bearing". -both being equivalent only if your starting position is on the equator.

For next version , I ll create both ways of defining the orbit . Either the inclination (in degrees,relative to the equator ) , and in Degrees of bearing ( as it is now  -wrongly defined as inclination), defining the starting bearing of the spacecraft
93
Report your Bugs here! / Jemini re entry bug
« Last post by Kmassie92 on January 23, 2018, 01:56:04 AM »
Hi when re entering atmosphere with the jemini capsule re entry flames look weird/huge then when its time to deploy shoots they dont open and flames dont  go away can this be fixed thanks cheers
94
Feature Request / Re: Inclination
« Last post by pclaurent on January 22, 2018, 05:07:19 PM »
hello jcarrion,

Just to be clear: equatorial/equatorial inclination is one thing, bearing is another one (90 bearing starting at KSC will result in a 25 orbital inclination). I was speaking about inclination (as probably you too in the parameter dialog), not bearing. To my opinion, switching inclination sign in the dialog (and allowing -180 to +180) would be enough for a start...
95
Feature Request / Just a reminder that I want to beta test next mobile ver
« Last post by Kmassie92 on January 22, 2018, 01:35:56 PM »
Hi I am just reminding you that whenever the mobile beta testing starts for next mobile version I want to test it please thank you so much keep up the great work 😀
96
Report your Bugs here! / Re: Custom missions loading bug
« Last post by jcarrion on January 22, 2018, 11:14:45 AM »
yep ,we found this bug too.  Will be sorted out in the next mobile release. 

Thanks .
97
Report your Bugs here! / Re: Not a bug but need a contact.
« Last post by jcarrion on January 22, 2018, 11:13:35 AM »
hi.  
you can contact us at Info@brixtondynamics.co.uk
Thanks!.
98
Feature Request / Re: Planetary constants
« Last post by jcarrion on January 22, 2018, 09:44:49 AM »
hi. 
I ll get this looked at ,  Thanks for the report.
99
Feature Request / Re: Inclination
« Last post by jcarrion on January 22, 2018, 09:43:26 AM »
hi,. 

well , the range -180.0 +180.0 will be fixed in the next mobile beta release ( too busy now with the Steam launch , )

The term inclination also can be a bit misleading.. as it refers to the bearing of the spacecraft (.i.e.  if you set long/lat coordinates at the pole ,all orbits would be with an inclination of +/-90 degrees, yet still you may want to select the orbital plane.  "Inclination" parameter selects the planet base "bearing" of the spacecraft the position selected.  Probbably we should enable both  methods (bearing and/or  orbital inclination ) in the next mobile release.
100
Feature Request / Inclination
« Last post by pclaurent on January 21, 2018, 02:17:42 PM »
Using custom scenarios in Orbit mode, the indicated inclination is counted in retrograde direction. So to put our spacecraft in a simple prograde equatorial orbit, we must put a 179 inclination value in the parameters. Would be more logical and natural to use direct prograde values (0 for a 0 inclined orbit on equator). Plus, the max. value is presently 179 (and not 180), so a pure equatorial orbit is impossible...
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]